Medical coding services

Every code your practice submits is either earning revenue or creating an audit risk.

Every chart at MedHeave goes through a specialty-specific review across ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS by AAPC-certified coders. Our medical coding services make sure every code that leaves your practice is earning revenue, not creating a problem you will have to fix later.

Our operational footprint

These aren't aspirational targets. These are what we deliver, consistently, across all practices we work with.

95%

Coding Accuracy Rate

>20%

Increased Payments

95%

Audit Issue Resolution

48 Hrs

Query Turnaround

Coding errors do not always announce themselves.

Claims pass through your billing system cleanly but fail at clearinghouse or payer review when diagnosis pointers fail to link ICD-10 codes properly to CPT procedures, the CPT code order was not correct, modifier combinations trigger NCCI edits, or E/M service levels lack complete documentation support for the level billed.

These coding gaps create silent revenue leakage that compounds month after month until collections consistently fall below expectations and AR aging shows unexpected balances accumulating beyond 60 days.

As part of our medical coding services, MedHeave prevents these losses by reviewing every complete chart against provider documentation, validating diagnosis-procedure linkage, checking all modifier applications against current NCCI edits, and ensuring medical necessity requirements are met before any claim reaches the payer.

Where things go wrong in medical coding

Three coding gaps that create 80% of denials. We close them all.

Coding problems compound quietly. A 2% error rate across 500 monthly claims is ten claims coded wrong every single month. Over a year, that is a material revenue loss and a compliance exposure that grows with every submission cycle.

Unsigned notes and incomplete documentation delay every claim attached to them

When a payer downcodes your claim because the documentation does not fully support the E/M code billed, the payment still posts. There is no denial of work and no alert to follow up on. The difference between what was billed and what was paid gets absorbed into your revenue numbers and written off without anyone identifying it as a coding problem.

Claims submitted without scrubbing come back as denials that take weeks to resolve

When a payer’s coding policy overrides AMA CPT guidelines, the payer’s policy takes precedence for claim payment. A coder working solely from AMA standards, without checking payer-specific rules, is submitting claims that pay less than the contract allows on every single submission to that payer. It does not show up as an error. It shows up as a payment that looks correct, and the lost revenue stays invisible until someone compares what came in against what the payer actually owes.

Without systematic AR follow-up, outstanding revenue is gone forever

Downcoded claims, missed procedures, incorrectly linked diagnoses, and payer-specific guideline mismatches are huge problems but they still generate payments. You don’t get any alerts until someone audits them against the payer’s contracted amount and that’s when you see a mismatch. But most practices never run that audit. The revenue gap stays invisible until it becomes a cash flow problem.

Calculate your revenue loss

Find out how much your practice is losing to billing gaps every month.

This is not an estimate. It’s calculation based on your actual billing volume, denial rate, and collection gaps.

Please select a specialty.
Enter monthly claims (1–99,999).
Enter the amount collected per claim ($1–$9,999).
Your current billing performance
Current denial rate (%) 12%
<5% (excellent)35% (critical)
How is billing handled at your practice?
In-house billing
Our billing is done by in-house employees.
Outsourced to a billing company
A professional billing service handles it.
Our EMR/EHR handles it automatically
Auto-billing through our software.
I manage it myself
The physician handles billing personally.
When a claim gets denied, what usually happens?
We write most off
Too time-consuming to fight.
We appeal some, but not all
Roughly a third get challenged.
We appeal nearly every denial
Strong, disciplined follow-up.
$0

Fill in your details and click Calculate now to see your estimate.

$0
Estimated annual revenue loss
$0 / month
Estimate capped at 45% of monthly revenue for accuracy.
Practice name
Specialty
Monthly claims submitted
Average payment per claim ($)
Denied claims never recovered$0
Undercoding loss$0
AR write-off risk$0
Missed appeal recovery$0
Talk to an expert for a detailed audit report
Estimates are based on published industry averages for your specialty (MGMA, HFMA, CMS data) and may not reflect your specific payer contracts, fee schedules, patient population, or operational practices. Results are for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied upon as financial projections. Actual revenue recovery results with any billing service will vary.

Our medical coding services

Every diagnosis, procedure, and modifier your chart generates is verified before it is billed.

A claim that looks clean can still be wrong. We review every diagnosis, procedure, and modifier against your documentation and payer-specific guidelines, so a coding error is never the reason you lose revenue.

ICD-10-CM, CPT, and HCPCS code assignment

Before a single code is entered, our coders work through the complete clinical record. HPI, examination findings, labs, imaging, and all documented procedures are reviewed together so no billable service is missed and no diagnosis goes unlinked. Modifiers are assigned based on payer-specific guidelines, and every code combination is checked against NCCI edits before the claim is finalized.

Specialty-specific coding

Surgical operative notes require a different level of review than an office visit. Cardiology bundling rules are not the same as orthopedic modifier usage. We assign coders by specialty so the person reviewing your charts knows the global periods, the NCCI edits, the payer-specific policies, and the documentation requirements that apply to your specific claim types.

Modifier application and bundling review

Modifier errors are among the most common reasons clean-looking claims return at a reduced rate. Our coders verify every modifier against payer-specific guidelines and cross-reference NCCI procedure-to-procedure edits before an encounter is submitted. Global surgical packages are tracked across all three CMS period designations, 0-day, 10-day, and 90-day, and every service within those periods is reviewed to confirm it is either bundled correctly or billed separately with the modifier that documentation and payer guidelines support.

Telehealth encounter coding

Telehealth coding requires three things to be correct simultaneously:

  • The CPT code
  • The modifier
  • The place-of-service designation

A wrong modifier or an incorrect POS code does not always deny the claim, but it pays at the wrong rate across every affected encounter. Our coders apply the 2026 telehealth coding structure on every visit: 98000 through 98007 for audio-video encounters and 98008 through 98015 for audio-only, with modifier 95, 93, or GT assigned based on the visit type and the payer’s specific policy, and POS 02 or 10 applied based on the patient’s location at the time of the visit.

Provider query management

Documentation gaps that are not resolved at the coding stage become denials at the billing stage. When our coders identify missing, ambiguous, or insufficient documentation, a query is sent through your practice management software that identifies the specific information needed, the code it affects, and the documentation standard the payer will apply on adjudication. Providers receive queries tracked and followed up on, so no chart sits unresolved past the point where it affects your filing window.

Medical coding audit

For every new client, we complete a coding audit before working on a single active claim. We review existing coding for upcoding, downcoding, unlinked diagnoses, missing CPT codes, wrong CPT code ordering, incorrect modifiers, and patterns that would attract payer scrutiny. Every risk identified is documented with specifics, including codes, payers, claim types, and correction requirements. You know exactly what your current coding looks like before we start working on your accounts.

Surgical and operative note coding

Surgical coding requires reading the entire operative report, not just the procedure summary. Our coders identify every billable component from the full note, including anatomical site, surgical approach, technique, and any implants or complications managed during the procedure. Multi-surgeon and co-surgeon scenarios are handled with the correct modifiers applied to each provider’s claim, and every coding decision is supported by the specific documentation in the operative report before it goes to billing.

Compliance and audit risk management

Compliance in coding is not a separate review step. It is built into the workflow on every encounter. Every code that goes out is checked against payer-specific guidelines, LCD and NCD policies, NCCI edits, and AMA CPT rules. Where payer policies conflict with AMA guidelines, the payer policy is applied, and the difference is documented. This protects your practice in the event of an audit and ensures your reimbursements are not being quietly reduced because of guideline mismatches that your previous coder never caught.

Retrospective coding review

For practices with a backlog of uncoded or miscoded encounters, we conduct a retrospective review within the applicable filing window. Every claim still within its correction or appeal deadline is identified and worked on before that window closes. Commercial payers typically allow 90 days, and Medicare allows up to a year. We map out the full backlog so you see all the claims with the shortest windows are worked first, and nothing expires while the review is in progress.

Specialties we code for

Your specialty gets undivided attention from a dedicated coder.

The specialties with the highest denial rates share one common cause: the coding was handled by whoever was available, not by someone trained for it. We assign coders trained specifically in your specialty, not generalists filling a gap.

Behavioral health

In behavioral health, missing eligibility or session tracking can cost several visits, not just one. We stay ahead of authorization limits, benefit caps, telehealth rules, and co-pay terms so billing stays steady through care.

Podiatry

For podiatry billing, we make sure modifiers like 25 and RT/LT are accurate, services align with global periods and payer edits, and orthotics always meet payer-specific authorization and DME requirements before claims go out.

Urgent care

We handle urgent care billing across walk-ins, diagnostics, and procedures. From there, we track payor coding rules, facility contracts, prior authorizations, and eligibility checks so claims never get delayed, cut, or denied.

Orthopedic

We handle orthopedic billing, making sure procedures get authorized upfront and modifiers like LT/RT and bilateral get applied well. Surgical cases with implants are coded and billed the way payers actually expect for payment.

Cardiology

Cardiology billing often triggers NCCI edit denials, bundling issues, and global period violations when E/M services and procedures are billed together. We manage coding and modifier logic to reduce denials and boost payments.

DME

DME billing is handled by aligning orders, documentation, and delivery timelines with payer rules. We apply HCPCS coding, manage capped rentals, and enforce refill limits so claims are never denied for missing paperwork today.

Pediatrics

In pediatrics, we handle well visits and immunizations, making sure vaccine administration and VFC eligibility are correct. Age-based coding stays accurate as well, so nothing gets missed, underbilled, or delayed at any visit.

Anesthesia

The accuracy of anesthesia billing depends on capturing start and stop times correctly. We ensure precise time capture, apply base units and modifiers, and handle medical direction & concurrency so each unit is billed right.

Don’t see your specialty? We likely work in it.

Why MedHeave

Coding accuracy is not our selling point. It is our minimum standard.

Most coding services process your charts and move on. We review every encounter against your documentation, your payer’s specific guidelines, and current NCCI edits before anything reaches billing. Your compliance record and your reimbursements are protected on every submission, not just the ones that get flagged.

You get a coder who codes your specialty every single day

A coder unfamiliar with your specialty misses what the documentation is actually saying. We match coders to specialties they work in daily, so nothing billable is missed and no modifier is applied without the guideline to back it up.

When CMS updates the rules, your claims update with them

Most coding teams catch guideline changes after a claim has already gone out wrong. We verify every update through CMS, AMA CPT publications, and AAPC bulletins and apply it to active accounts on the day it is released.

Payer conflicts are caught before they cost you a clean claim

A payer's reimbursement policy and AMA CPT guidelines are not always the same thing, and the difference comes out of your revenue. We verify payer-specific rules through official provider manuals and published bulletins before coding, so your claims are built around what the payer will actually reimburse, not what the CPT book says in isolation.

Documentation gaps are flagged before they become denials

When documentation falls short, most coders downcode and move on. Our medical coding services don't do that. Instead, we send a targeted query through your practice management software, and track it until the provider responds. The code does not get finalized until we have all the documentation supporting it.

Nothing goes to billing until the coder has reviewed every claim

Before any encounter moves to billing, the coder reviews every diagnosis against the procedure it supports, verifies every modifier against payer and specialty guidelines, and confirms global period days on every surgical claim.

Our medical coding process

Medical coding requires focus.
Ours lasts longer than a reel.

Coding without accuracy is how practices end up in audits. Our process is designed to be fast enough to keep your revenue cycle moving and structured enough to catch errors before claims are submitted.

01

Full chart review before any code is assigned
When a chart arrives, whether it comes through your EHR, a superbill, or clinical documentation sent directly, our coder reviews the entire record. HPI, examination findings, labs, imaging, and procedures performed are all read before a single code is entered. A coder who skips to the diagnosis without reading the full encounter misses secondary diagnoses, complicating conditions, and procedures that are billable but not documented on the superbill.

02

Code assignment with documentation linkage
ICD-10-CM, CPT, and HCPCS codes are assigned from the full clinical documentation, not just what the superbill lists. We link every diagnosis to the procedure it supports, every modifier is applied only after the procedure is verified against the notes, and every code combination is cross-checked against NCCI edits and Exclude 1 and Exclude 2 guidelines before the claim moves forward.

03

Provider query when documentation requires it
If the documentation does not support the code, we do not guess, and we do not downcode without flagging it. A specific query is sent through your practice management software that identifies exactly what information is missing, which code it affects, and what the provider needs to supply to resolve it. Our medical coding services ensure queries are tracked and followed up on within 72 hours.

04

Self-review before submission
Every completed encounter is reviewed by the coder before it moves to billing. Diagnoses are checked against procedures. Modifiers are verified against payer and specialty guidelines. Global period days are confirmed for any surgical encounter. This review step is not optional; it is essential to our workflow.

05

Submission to billing
We send the encounter to billing with the codes, the modifiers, and the documentation linkage already established. If a payer denies the claim and asks for clinical justification, the coding rationale is already on file, and there is no reconstruction after the fact.

06

Guideline updates applied in real time
When CMS or AMA releases a mid-year update, we do not wait for a quarterly training cycle and implement it immediately. We verify the update through official sources, CMS guidelines, AMA CPT publications, AAPC bulletins, and apply it to active accounts the same day. Clients are notified promptly, so your team is not caught off guard by a payer policy change that has already affected your claims.
When things go wrong

If a claim is complicated, we do not pass it back to you unresolved.

Not every coding problem is solved just by checking the CPT book. When a complex scenario surfaces, whether it is a duplicate billing conflict, a payer guideline dispute, or a high-complexity denial, we go back to documentation, payer rules, and coding guidelines to resolve it correctly.
Duplicate service conflicts between two providers seeing the same patient

When two providers see the same patient on the same day and both bill an E/M, the payer denies one automatically. We identify which service requires a code change, apply the correct CPT with supporting documentation, and separate the billing under the appropriate NPI where the payer allows it.

High complexity denials that require more than a resubmission

When a high-complexity claim is denied, resubmitting the same codes is not going to work. We pull the full operative note or clinical documentation, identify every billable component that was missed or miscoded, and rebuild the claim against the documentation and the applicable LCD or NCD policy before it goes back to the payer.

Payer guideline conflicts that put your reimbursement at risk

When a payer's coding policy conflicts with AMA CPT guidelines, quoting the CPT manual back to the payer does not resolve the dispute. As part of our medical coding services, we verify the payer's published policy through their official provider manual, document where the conflict exists, and apply the rule that governs payment.

Compliance risks that surface during a coding audit

When a coding audit reveals patterns of miscoded claims, the priority is not the report; it is what can still be recovered. We document every risk, cross-reference each claim against the payer's correction, appeal deadline, and work through the backlog in deadline order so no correctable claim expires.

Performance monitoring in medical coding services

If something is underperforming, we will know it before you.

Most medical coding services work in silence and surface problems after it has done the damage. We communicate every flag, every provider query, and every guideline conflict through your PM software in real time so your team always has the full picture before anything reaches billing.

01

DETECT

Every gap gets traced to its source

When a chart has a documentation gap, a payer conflict, or a bundling issue, it is flagged immediately in your PM software. You see it in real time, not at the end of the week when the damage is already done.

02

REPORT

Provider queries are tracked until they are closed

When documentation is insufficient, we send a targeted message through your PM software with exactly what is missing. We track every open query and do not finalize the code until the provider has responded and the documentation supports it.

03

RESOLVE

Guideline updates reach your account the day they are released

When CMS or AMA releases a change, we apply it to active accounts immediately and communicate it through email and portal alerts. Your team knows about it before it has a chance to affect a submission.

FAQ’s

Questions we often hear from providers like you.

These are the questions our operations team gets asked on every discovery call by providers that want to know exactly how their revenue cycle will be managed before they partner with us.

What certifications should a medical coding service have?

Look for CPC certification from AAPC at a minimum. A Certified Professional Coder has demonstrated competency in CPT, ICD-10, and HCPCS coding across physician-based services. At MedHeave, our coders hold CPC certification and maintain it through active continuing education units.

At MedHeave, encounters are coded immediately after the provider adds them to the practice management system or submits superbills and clinical documentation. The chart is reviewed and coded the same day it arrives, instead of putting them in delay.

A vendor takes your charts and processes them. A partner offering medical coding services reviews documentation, flags gaps before they become denials, communicates through your PM software in real time, and applies guideline changes to your account the day they are released. The difference shows up in your clean claim rate and your audit exposure.

Every encounter is reviewed against the full medical notes before a code is finalized. NCCI edits and Exclude 1 and Exclude 2 notes are applied to every submission. Codes are assigned only for services that are clearly documented, and modifiers are applied only when the guideline supports them.

Before any encounter moves to billing, the coder reviews every diagnosis against the procedure it supports, verifies every modifier against payer and specialty guidelines, applies NCCI edits, and confirms global period days on every surgical claim. Nothing is submitted until every element of the encounter holds up against the documentation.

CMS NCCI Procedure-to-Procedure edits are used to identify bundled CPT code pairs. Modifiers 25 and 59 are applied where the service qualifies as separately billable. For global periods, modifier 24 is used with E/M codes, and modifiers 58, 78, and 79 are applied to post-operative services according to whether the procedure is staged, related, or unrelated to the original surgery.

Incorrect coding, whether upcoding, downcoding, or unbundling, creates patterns that trigger payer audits and compliance reviews. Accurate coding requires alignment with CPT, ICD-10, and payer-specific guidelines on every claim, not just the ones that get flagged.

When documentation is missing or insufficient to support the code, a message is sent to the provider through the practice management software, identifying exactly what is missing. The chart is not finalized until the provider responds and the documentation supports the code.

When you transition to us, charts are reviewed from start to finish, including HPI, exam notes, labs, and procedures. We identify all diagnoses and assign ICD‑10, CPT, and HCPCS codes before submission. Nothing disappears; every encounter moves smoothly into your new coding workflow.

Recurring denials usually stem from missing or unsupported documentation. We analyze claim histories to find patterns, review payer rules, and adjust codes or modifiers to align with medical necessity requirements.

When payer-specific rules differ from AMA CPT guidelines, the payer’s published policies take precedence for payment. We verify those rules through official bulletins and notify providers so coding stays accurate across different payers.

You have already earned this money.
Let us help you collect it.

A free audit takes less than 24 hours to schedule and gives you a complete picture of what your billing cycle is missing.

Scroll to Top
Book a call

We listen and we don’t judge.

30 minutes of this call can save you up to 25% of lost revenue.

In this session, we’ll walk you through

The best time to fix your billing was last year. The second best time is right now.

Most practices do not realize how much revenue is slipping through the billing process until someone audits it. A 15 minute conversation with us is usually enough to find out where yours is going. 

    Your details have been submitted. Someone from our team will be in touch shortly.